If you use a Yahoo, Microsoft, AOL, or other non-Gmail email account, Google may owe you $5,000 for illegally intercepting your emails.

Retain one of the nation's best lawyers for only $1. Join others in this on-file lawsuit.

Hear from Ray, then call us with questions at 415.257.8800 x 11

Read the initial complaint


Google made money by intercepting and processing emails you sent to Gmail users. We've been fighting Google in Court for three years. We've seen the evidence and gotten the court rulings. We won settlements in two previous cases: Gmail has changed its architecture pursuant to a court order (in Matera v. Google).  And we settled some damage claims (in Corley v. Google).

Now, it's time to collect on your claims for damages
Read our reviews. We put you first. Learn more below. See the FAQs for details. 
Where do I learn more?  See the FAQs
If you’ve never had a Gmail account and didn’t know that Google was intercepting and processing your emails to Gmail users for advertising purposes, you have strong claims under the California Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA).

CIPA claims are worth $5,000.

But act now. All claims will expire. 


How do you join? Click Here
Answer a few questions to qualify.

What’s at stake?
Your freedom, your security, and your privacy.

Google intercepted and analyzed your intimate communications with Gmail users using cutting-edge artificial intelligence to develop “user profiles”.

“We know where you are. We know where you’ve been. We can more or less know what you’re thinking about.”
             - Google’s former CEO, Eric Schmidt.

People emailing Gmail users have "no reasonable expectation” that their communications are confidential.
             - Google.

What can you do?
Join the Lawsuit, assert your rights and reject email surveillance. Seek your $5,000 from Google for its violations.

Click Here To Join

Call with questions at 415.257.8800 x 11

This site is sponsored by Ray E. Gallo and Gallo LLP, 1604 Solano Avenue Suite B, Berkeley, CA 94707

Mobile copy of 2014 reg pr shot blushrt smile
Ray graduated from Yale in 1987 and earned his law degree from UCLA in 1992. He is a repeat winner of AVVO's clients' choice awards, holds AVVO's perfect 10/10 rating, Martindale Hubbel's "Pre-eminent" "AV" rating, and has been named as one of LawDragon's 100 Leading Legal Consultants and Strategists nationally. Mr. Gallo's AVVO reviews reflect his clients' consistent satisfaction. He crusades for consumers and for clients who can’t afford to pursue their claims unless they organize through a site like this one. He believes in representation and justice. To read more about his efforts and his successes click the links below.






You can also find testimonials from consumer, executive, and corporate clients, testimonials from our former opposing counsel, awards, information about past results, attorney profiles, and other information on our main website.


Notice

This website is attorney advertising. This website is not an offer to provide legal services but, depending on your answers to our questions here, we may offer to be your lawyers. We are not your lawyers until you and we sign our written fee agreement. The information on this site is not legal advice. Our statements here are our opinions only. Our past results depended on the unique facts and law of those cases, and do not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction of the outcome of any other matter, including this one. If we offer to represent you, it's because we think you have a claim worth asserting, one that we're willing to risk our valuable time and money prosecuting. Having a good claim is not money in the bank, though. The outcome of all cases is uncertain. Our proposed fee agreement specifies that you will not pay us anything, either fees our costs, from your pocket. We will look solely to the defendant(s) to be paid. Please read our website Notices, Terms, and Conditions for additional terms of use for this website. Please also see the terms of use at https://gallo.law/terms, which are hereby incorporated as though repeated here.